[boost] Re: checked_delete / CW8

From: David Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2003-08-16 07:06:43

Daniel Frey <d.frey_at_[hidden]> writes:

> On Sat, 16 Aug 2003 04:11:09 +0200, David Abrahams wrote:
>
>> David Abrahams <dave_at_[hidden]> writes:
>> 
>>> Daniel Frey <d.frey_at_[hidden]> writes:
>>>
>>>> Hi Dave,
>>>>
>>>> I checked in a fix for checked_delete.hpp for the Metrowerks CW8 to
>>>> CVS HEAD. It was created in cooperation with Howard and I'm positiv
>>>> that it's a good one-size-fits-all solution. I don't know about your
>>>> shedule for 1.30.2, but you might want to consider merging it to
>>>> RC_1_30_0. I will not push this as I don't want to delay 1.30.2,
>>>> having it in 1.31.0 is fine, too.
>>>
>>> Hmm, I use Pro8.3 all the time and have never seen a need for a patch
>>> to checked_delete.  Ah, the regressions were in expected-failure
> tests?
>
> The regression depends on the compiler flags. It occurs with "-iso_templates
> on" which - according to Howard - is a good idea to use. Personally, I
> have no clue what it's good for... :)

It enables conformance ;-)
Of course all of my compiles and the Boost regression tests are run
using -iso_templates on.

>> OK, I like your patch and I've applied it in the branch. I'm going to
>> release tomorrow morning after the meta-comm regressions have run again.
>
> Thanks. I'll keep my fingers crossed...

Still no joy :(

-- 
Dave Abrahams
Boost Consulting
www.boost-consulting.com