[boost] Re: Optional, tie, and iterator_adaptor

From: David Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2003-08-31 13:52:58

"Joel de Guzman" <djowel_at_[hidden]> writes:

> What I am trying very hard to say is to stick to only *ONE* interface
> and one concept.

Optional is a container.  I've never seen a container in C++ which didn't
have both a value interface and an element-access interface.  How do
you propose to achieve that with optional?

-- 
Dave Abrahams
Boost Consulting
www.boost-consulting.com