[boost] Re: In-place construction for variant

From: Alexander Terekhov (terekhov_at_[hidden])
Date: 2003-11-04 04:16:05

David Abrahams wrote:
[...]
>        If you like, the catch(...) block can be replaced with an
> automatic object's destructor, but that changes nothing as far as
> standard C++ is concerned.

Sure it does change something. It wont "necessarily" trigger 
unwinding for unexpected exceptions. And pretending that as 
far the standard/portable C++ is concerned they're nonexistent
won't really help you to deal with them (given that they can
be thrown by the ordinal C++ throw-expressions, not only "SEH"
things).

regards,
alexander.