From: John Maddock (john_at_[hidden])
Date: 2003-11-14 06:13:17
> I guess that's their problem, since AFAICT we're unable to properly
> detect all the conditions which say whether wchar_t is supported.
> I'm sympathetic to users who want to do that, but we have one build
> system which we're claiming to support. It seems to me that we
> should support it, no?
Yep, how about defining our own macro when wchar_t is really a type, and
defining it in the build system, and documenting it as a user settable macro
in the config system. How about BOOST_NATIVE_WCHAR_T for want of a better
BTW the msvc toolset now has a <native-wchar_t> setting, maybe we could do
the same for the Intel one?
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, david.abrahams at rcn.com, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk