From: Deane Yang (deane_yang_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-01-09 15:32:48
Matthias Schabel wrote:
> May I suggest you take a look at my YANL library (on the Yahoo files
> section)? Its dimensional
> analysis code (which underlies the unit code that is the subject of so
> much debate) does exactly
> what you discuss above...
I've long suspected so and have been waiting for you to
protest like this. Thanks. I promise to try it.
But it's getting really confusing whether this is the dimensions
part or the units part (I am capable of arguing either side).
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, david.abrahams at rcn.com, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk