From: Jonathan Turkanis (technews_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-01-25 17:56:05
"Jens Maurer" <Jens.Maurer_at_[hidden]> wrote in message
> David Abrahams wrote:
> > Thomas and I discussed both options (I think [review] would be a
> > appropriate tag). The thing I like about the mailing list is that
> > review commentary has a value all its own, and it would be great
> > able to search reviews separately.
> Just to clarify: The "boost-review" list would be for review
> only, the actual review still happening on the main boost list?
> Discussion on the library itself should probably not be fractioned
> into the regular boost discussion and boost-review.
How about keeping the discussion of libraries on the main list, but
forwarding a copy of each message in which a poster votes yes or no to
the review list? The review manager could forward the messages,
perhaps with subjects like "[Library] Reviewer - Yes".
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, david.abrahams at rcn.com, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk