Re: [boost] Re: [administrative] Formal Review Process

From: Thomas Witt (witt_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-01-27 01:22:54

David Abrahams wrote:

> John Torjo <john.lists_at_[hidden]> writes:
> 
> 
>>How about having the email' addresses of all the review managers on
>>the formal_review_process.html page?  (and update this page as review
>>managers are added or deleted)
>>
>>The one making a review request will have to write an email to all of
>>the managers, and see which one is available.  I don't think there
>>would be a problem if for a review request we would have multiple
>>review managers.
> 
> 
> I think we should:
> 
>   a. Make being a review manager or a moderator or a wizard one of the
>      conditions of having a library in boost
> 
>   b. Use a regular rotating schedule for review managers.  If you're
>      not going to be available when your time comes up, it should be
>      your responsibility to find someone to swap with.

 From my experience strict rotating works almost never due to time 
constraints or library topic.

I am unsure whether this is not too much pressure to put it on highly 
skilled volunteers.

Thomas