[boost] Re: future of boost.threads

From: Alexander Terekhov (terekhov_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-02-09 17:30:31

David Abrahams wrote:
[...]
> > thrown (or may be something equivalent to 'unexpected'). If it is
> > derived from a declared one, it will be sliced.
> 
> Is everyone convinced that propagating the exception into the joining
> thread is the right behavior or even semantically sensible?

I'm convinced that propagating *unexpected* exceptions into the 
joining thread is totally wrong and insensible. 

regards,
alexander.