Re: [boost] Re: 1.31.0 regressions

From: Peter Dimov (pdimov_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-02-18 07:35:58

Russell Hind wrote:
> Pavel Vozenilek wrote:

[...]

>> 3. It is far from clear if there will be new Borland C++ compiler at
>>     all. Borland may decide to drop out of C++ market completely -
>>     it may be waste to spend effort with beta until things get clear.
>>
>
> In that case again, why should boost keep supporting it if Borland
> won't?

Because I may want to? Why should I be prevented from supporting bcc if I so
desire? Should I be forced to run my own regression tests in order to
provide that support?