RE: [boost] Re: boost::any: explicit constructor?

From: David Bergman (davidb_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-02-28 23:06:58

I wrote:
> >That is why we should always use "covariant" and "contravariant"

Victor responded: 
> oh yeah, covariant and contravariant are pellucidly clear 
> </extreme sarcasm> they also differ by only 3 letters (in the 
> middle) and are hard to read

Actually the start tag of the "extreme sarcasm" element started around two
lines above your reply ;-)

/David