From: Daryle Walker (darylew_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-02-29 08:21:04
On 2/25/04 8:16 PM, "Thorsten Ottosen" <nesotto_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> "Phil Richards" <news_at_[hidden]> wrote in message
>> people would understand "io" as an abbreviation with no real potential for
>> confusion. (And if they are confused, I hate to think what they will think
>> an "iostream" is.) If the stuff ever made it into the standard, then you'd
>> get "std::io" which would make ex-C programmers happy too.
>> So, do we move filesystem to boost::io::filesystem? :-)
> Will the extra 'filesystem' namespace be necessary?
Earlier in this thread, didn't we say that a third namespace level should be
-- Daryle Walker Mac, Internet, and Video Game Junkie darylew AT hotmail DOT com
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, david.abrahams at rcn.com, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk