Re: [boost] Re: please read! min/max guidelines

From: Beman Dawes (bdawes_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-03-02 12:13:20

At 09:31 PM 2/29/2004, Jeff Garland wrote:

 >> This would be a simple search/replace, so I don't mind. Can we all
 >> agree on boost::min_? I don't want to have to change it again.
 >
 >No, I don't think it is worth changing again.  min_ isn't better than
 >std_min in my view. Put extra comments in the code / docs to explain
 >it.  Changing it again means all of us will have to re-integrate your
 >new changes.  It's working, don't mess with it, lets move on.

I agree with Jeff, both that std_min seems better than min_, and that we 
should just move on.

--Beman