Re: [boost] Re: Re: Re: First lambda

From: Jaakko Jarvi (jajarvi_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-03-04 09:40:39

> > Implicit templates would provide a fairly compact and
> > well defined syntax for lambdas, but the response to such implicit
> > templates in the standards committee was mild.
>
> That was my response too, when I first saw it. Was the response to
> using 'auto' as a return type more positive?
>
Yes. That's still on the agenda.

  Jaakko