RE: [boost] Re: Yo, move semantics anyone?

From: Reid Sweatman (drunkardswalk_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-04-14 20:50:04

> -----Original Message-----
> From: boost-bounces_at_[hidden] 
> [mailto:boost-bounces_at_[hidden]] On Behalf Of Daniel Wallin
> Sent: Wednesday, April 14, 2004 9:40 AM
> To: boost_at_[hidden]
> Subject: [boost] Re: Yo, move semantics anyone?
> 
> 
> David Abrahams wrote:
> > Hi,
> > 
> > I'm just wondering if the deafening silence indicates a lack of
> > interest or whether something else is going on?  
> > Feedback would be appreciated.
> 
> I'm interested. And from what I can tell, the implementation 
> looks good.
> The macros are cool, even though my syntax highlighting broke down
> completely when I used them. ;)

I'm interested in it, as well.  Probably a lot of us figure it's better to
just lurk if we don't have anything of earth-shattering importance.  OT,
though, out of professional curiousity, what editor did this break the
syntax highlighting in?

Reid