From: Pavol Droba (droba_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-05-05 07:44:47
On Wed, May 05, 2004 at 06:35:31AM -0500, Aleksey Gurtovoy wrote:
> Pavol Droba writes:
> > On Wed, May 05, 2004 at 09:10:48AM +0800, Joel de Guzman wrote:
> > > John Torjo wrote:
> > >
> > > >Hi Thorsten,
> > > >
> > > >about the name of the library:
> > > >Not sure why it's called collection traits, since IMO it should better
> > > >be called either sequence traits, container traits, range traits or
> > > >array traits.
> > >
> > > I agree. I think sequence traits is most appropriate.
> > >
> > You are not quite right. Sequence concept is precisely defined in C++ standard.
> Yes, and that's unfortunate, because it is essentially a dead concept -- "nobody"
> writes generic code that relies on it -- that has occupied a good name. In fact,
> "Collection" is exactly the word that would perfectly fit to describe what the
> standard choose to refer to as "Sequence". I don't think going the other way
> around would be a good call. In CS terminology, collections are inherently
> associated with storage; using the term to name the concept that explicitly aims
> at representing sequences that do not necessarily have any is IMO a bad idea.
> > Collection traits are not implementig this concept, they don't even implement
> > full Container concept. So if would be very misleading to use the name of it.
> > Collection traits are working with structures that model Collection concept,
> > therfore they should be named after it IMHO.
> "Collection" is an unfortunate name for the concept. Not having "Sequence" at our
> disposal, it should be called "Iterator Range" or something along these lines.
Well I cannot judge the standard naming, however I think, that some standardization
is better then none. So if there is a definition we should change the standard of
stick to it. Later is probably more feasible.
I found collection easy to understand. I don't understand what is wrong with it.
It very well fits into the standard concept hierarchy
Collection < Container < Sequence
< Associative container
Unlike container, that have an ownership of its elements, collection might be
just a reference to values. So it describes a "collection" of values organized
in an arbitrary structure. Collection concept specifies an interface to
access these values.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, david.abrahams at rcn.com, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk