RE: [boost] Re: input_iterator_facade (was: Re: [iterator facade] Why isdereference const?)

From: Rozental, Gennadiy (gennadiy.rozental_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-06-05 06:11:27

> I guess we're back to your old disagreements about 
> flexibility. Flexibility is 
> fine, but it adds complexity, both for implementors and the user, so 
> flexibility should be added only when absolutely necessary. 
> The eof_iterator 
> is intented to be as simple as possible.
> 
> - Volodya

Actually after some consideration I incline to agree with you on most
points. Look in cvs on how my version looks now.

Gennadiy.