Re: [boost] result_ofOp, operator should be a template parameter

From: Joel de Guzman (joel_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-07-04 19:10:03

Doug Gregor wrote:

> 
> On Jul 3, 2004, at 4:38 AM, Andy Little wrote:
> 
>> An example that I think demonstrates the superiority of this:
>>
>>         binary_operation<A,Op,B>::result_type result;
>>
>> over this:
>>
>>     result_of_plus<A, B>::type result;
>>
>> in this directory:
> 
> 
> In Boost CVS there is an implementation of result_of, which would be 
> used like this:
> 
>     result_of<Op(A, B)>::type

I think this is the best interface I've seen so far. The result_of_plus
is just a temporary solution while waiting for Doug's result_of work
which was not available at the time.

Regards,
-- 
Joel de Guzman
http://www.boost-consulting.com
http://spirit.sf.net