[boost] Re: method deduction (on vc?)

From: David Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-07-14 10:43:25

Max Khesin <MKhesin_at_[hidden]> writes:

> But not (from your phrasing) function members?

I don't know about those; I haven't tried to find workarounds for that.

FWIW, designs that depend on member detection are often flawed from a
generic programming POV.  You can get accidental conformance, and
especially if there's no way to explicitly say what the member means
(e.g. with a traits specialization), you'll be out-of-luck.

-- 
Dave Abrahams
Boost Consulting
http://www.boost-consulting.com