[boost] Re: Suggestion for iterator_adaptor

From: David Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-07-15 10:58:06

"Fredrik Blomqvist" <fredrik_blomqvist_at_[hidden]> writes:

> David Abrahams wrote:
> [snip]
>> I'm soliciting suggestions for the name of the member.  All names with
>> suffixes like "_t" will be rejected, and be aware that base is
>> already taken for other purposes.  Currently my thoughts are
>>
>>         super   // super
>>         crtp    // ugly
>>
> Why not something related to "iterator" and/or "adaptor"?
> iterator_adaptor_base? adaptor_base?

and iterator_facade_base or facade_base?

Hmm, I guess in case of multiple inheritance that approach is more
useful.

-- 
Dave Abrahams
Boost Consulting
http://www.boost-consulting.com