[boost] Re: [Boost.Thread] mutex Win32 implementation changes

From: Michael Glassford (glassfordm_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-07-15 21:11:29

Alexander Terekhov wrote:

> Michael Glassford wrote:
> [...]
> 
>>Looking at this again, it's not entirely clear to me what the return
>>value of atomic<int>::swap() is. Can you clarify?
> 
> 
> Old value. InterlockedExchange. Brrr.
> 

Thanks. That's what I thought, but I wanted to make sure.

Mike