Re: [boost] Re: behond IOStreams

From: Carlo Wood (carlo_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-09-12 15:15:46

On Sun, Sep 12, 2004 at 01:42:25PM -0600, Jonathan Turkanis wrote:
>     But right now I need a break :-) If the library is accepted, my focus in my
> spare time will be to revise the library based on review comments. The
> documentation, in particular, seems to need major work.

I understand that you need to spend a lot of time on IOstreams.  There
have been a lot of comments - and obviously those need to be processed
somehow.

>    Maybe in a couple of months I'll  be ready to start thinking about
> generalizations ....

Right now I am stuck - I need a demultiplexor library that works on
at least windows and linux BADLY.  I will have to make a start with
this because there is not really anything else I can do (except when
say, I'd quit working on my current project and continue with my
ECC project that has been put in the freezer a while ago).

I hope you can find the time to briefly comment on the major decision
points that I will bring up on this list; it would not be efficient
if I started to do work on this library in a direction that you
disagree with on a fundamental level.

-- 
Carlo Wood <carlo_at_[hidden]>