Boost :

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

From: Aaron W. LaFramboise (aaronrabiddog51_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-09-13 10:21:44

Next message: Joaquín Mª López Muñoz: "Re: [boost] [1.32 Release] Branch-for-release date"
Previous message: Aaron W. LaFramboise: "Re: [boost] 2. It is unavoidable to use threads"
In reply to: Tony Juricic: "[boost] Re: Re: Secret handles and descriptors: Enemies of reuse, conspirators with frameworks."
Next in thread: Scott Woods: "Re: [boost] Secret handles and descriptors: Enemies of reuse, conspirators with frameworks."

Tony Juricic wrote:
> "Aaron W. LaFramboise" wrote:
>
>>On UNIX, a demultiplexor probably will be a wrapper for select(). On
>>Windows, it might be a wrapper for WaitForMultipleObjectsEx().
>
> Have you considered a completion port to get around 64 handles limitation?

Yes, I agree that this mechanism is the way to go. Using it, I do not
think the handle limitation should be a problem.

Aaron W. LaFramboise

Next message: Joaquín Mª López Muñoz: "Re: [boost] [1.32 Release] Branch-for-release date"
Previous message: Aaron W. LaFramboise: "Re: [boost] 2. It is unavoidable to use threads"
In reply to: Tony Juricic: "[boost] Re: Re: Secret handles and descriptors: Enemies of reuse, conspirators with frameworks."
Next in thread: Scott Woods: "Re: [boost] Secret handles and descriptors: Enemies of reuse, conspirators with frameworks."

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk