From: Peter Dimov (pdimov_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-11-17 14:08:36
Gennadiy Rozental wrote:
> "Peter Dimov" <pdimov_at_[hidden]> wrote in message
>> Robert Ramey wrote:
>>> Alternatively, you might want to consider expanding the shared_ptr
>>> interface with enough information to permit serialization to be
>>> implemented via the public interface.
>> How, exactly? The current public interface is good enough for my
>> serialization/deserialization needs, but I'm willing to consider your
> Do you remember out discussion on the subject.
> I still believe We dont need any modification in shared_ptr to make it
> serializable (even more I believe it's evil od request one). I don't
> remember ever your answer on my last post.
Can you please restate your questions, or point me to your last post
directly? I don't seem to be able to follow the thread to it.
Is there something I need to add to:
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, david.abrahams at rcn.com, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk