From: Andreas Huber (ahd6974-spamgroupstrap_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-11-18 13:18:56
Peter Dimov wrote:
> So "we can do this", but apparently we don't want to. If this is the
> case, and the current scheme is acceptable, it's easy for me to just
> add a friend declaration to shared_ptr and be done with it.
IIRC, then this would not solve one problem you described in an earlier
post. Namely how a weak_ptr can be loaded before the first shared_ptr
referencing the same object is loaded. As you stated, it seems that
solving this problem *requires* that serialization users can assoicate
arbitrary data with an archive during load.
-- Andreas Huber When replying by private email, please remove the words spam and trap from the address shown in the header.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, david.abrahams at rcn.com, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk