[boost] Re: boost.test covered in testing frameworks rundown

From: David Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-01-07 15:54:04

Gennadiy Rozental wrote:
> "Max Chasing" <MKhesin_at_[hidden]> wrote in message
> news:4B6FB7F60D37D41188C300B0D022E0C003965168_at_exchange.lnholdings.com...
>> http://www.gamesfromwithin.com/articles/0412/000061.html
>> Well, some good marks but no victory. Perhaps the people involved in the
>> library will find this useful.
>> cheers,
>> max
> 
> Hi,
> 
> I don't have much to say about this article, other then some statements
> seems questionable and many people have different priorities and
> requirements for testing framework. One thing needs to be spelled out
> though:

Gennadiy,

did you notice that you can respond on the article site, at the bottom
of the page?

-- 
Dave Abrahams
Boost Consulting
http://www.boost-consulting.com