Re: [boost] Re: BOOST_NO_RTTI?

From: Douglas Gregor (dgregor_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-01-08 10:32:47

On Jan 8, 2005, at 6:00 AM, John Maddock wrote:
>> Okay, so let's have BOOST_NO_RTTI defined when the 
>> compiler/environment
>> does not support RTTI, and we can use it to turn off use of RTTI in 
>> some Boost components :)
>>
>> But Peter is right, there are macros here... perhaps BOOST_NO_RTTI 
>> and BOOST_NO_DYNAMIC_RTTI, with the former implying the latter.
>
> Sounds reasonable to me, but do we ever use RTTI in non-dynamic 
> situations anyway?

Well, Function does. You can get the static type of the target function 
object.

        Doug