From: Scott Woods (scottw_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-01-13 16:59:23
----- Original Message -----
From: "Mithun R K" <mithun.radhakrishnan_at_[hidden]>
Sent: Friday, January 14, 2005 4:34 AM
Subject: RE: [boost] Singleton (with Singleton Registry: Clarification)
> Hello, Scott/Jason/All.
> Thank you for having looked at this approach.
> Scott, I'm not entirely sure I've understood everything you've said... I
> apologise if I've not made my approach clear. I'm afraid I might have
> up in explaining it.
Ah. Re-read a bunch of mail and think I understand the communications
difficulty. I (wrongly) assumed you were proposing the ordering of
dtor as a solution to a problem. Actually you were presenting this as
If this is correct then my observations are irrelevant. Of course the
that doesnt mean my problem goes away. Its just lurking in the background
waiting for a software tester to travel a certain execution path.
I suspect that if the underlying problem was solved then the need
for something like longevity-int-ordering is obviated? Hmmmmm.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, david.abrahams at rcn.com, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk