|
Boost : |
From: Hubert Holin (Hubert.Holin_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-02-11 10:09:58
Somewhere in the E.U., le 11/02/2005
Bonjour
In article <uy8ekakyq.fsf_at_[hidden]>,
David Abrahams <dave_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> Preston,
>
> The best place for Boost.Python questions is the C++-sig:
> http://www.boost.org/more/mailing_lists.htm#cplussig
>
> "Preston A. Elder" <prez_at_[hidden]> writes:
[SNIP]
> > Also, on another note, is there somewhere that has all of boost
> > already pythonized?
>
> No.
>
> > I manually converted boost::date_time (at least all the gregorian
> > and posix_time stuff) myself, however I would have expected most of
> > boost to have been converted to python already ;)
>
> It seems unlikely to me. Because so much of Boost is heavily
> templated generic code, a great deal of it would make no sense as
> Python wrappers. Can you imagine Pythonizing the Boost.Python
> library? ;-)
As an organizational note, what would be best, when we add more
conversions to Python? Various pieces bundled with the lib's doc, or in
a centralized location TBD?
Hubert Holin
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk