Re: [boost] Re: Re: Re: [review] hash functions

From: Peter Dimov (pdimov_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-03-10 16:35:56

JOAQUIN LOPEZ MU?Z wrote:
>
> Maybe the following approach could be taken to
> allow for alternative implementations to be plugged into
> the framework: [...]

> unordered_set<my_type,boost::hash<my_type,crypto_impl> > us;

The proposal is not a framework, it contains two simple tools for 
constructing hash_value overloads for compound types and a suite of 
_default_ hash functions.

Alternative implementations (who may or may not use the supplied tools) are 
supported by unordered_set by simply using

    unordered_set< my_type, my_hash > us;

There's no need to plug them in.