Re: [boost] Re: [signals] Performance

From: Jody Hagins (jody-boost-011304_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-03-31 10:28:38

On Wed, 30 Mar 2005 20:28:47 -0600
Robert Zeh <razeh_at_[hidden]> wrote:

> 
> After consulting with Doug Gregor I've done some more work on signals
> performance.  The patch I've attached removes the pImpl idiom in
> named_slot_map and iterator_facade.
> 
> The signals regression tests still past.
> 
> The performance numbers look better.  Here are the speed test numbers
> from the current boost CVS.

That is a very impressive improvement!!!

I have not yet looked at the patch, but I am somewhat interested in the
performance impact of the pimp idiom by itself (if my understanding is
correct and that is, indeed, the only change).