Re: [boost] Re: [shared_ptr] possible bug in sp_counted_base.hpp

From: Peter Dimov (pdimov_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-04-14 15:07:48

Rene Rivera wrote:
> I running the timing tests again, with some changes to see if I can
> get more representative numbers.

If you can get the assembly version to outperform the generic Win32 version, 
you mean ;-)

But out of curiosity, what changes? I've been thinking to add a more 
representative shared_ptr and weak_ptr timing tests. The _mt versions aren't 
bad, though.

> But attached is the end result.

>> //  detail/sp_counted_base_gcc_x86.hpp - g++ on 486+ or AMD64

You should probably fix this line...

>> //  Copyright (c) 2001, 2002, 2003 Peter Dimov and Multi Media Ltd.
>> //  Copyright 2004-2005 Peter Dimov

... and add your name here.