[boost] Re: TR2 and C++0x heads up

From: David Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-04-24 00:18:15

"Pavel Vozenilek" <pavel_vozenilek_at_[hidden]> writes:

> "Thorsten Ottosen" wrote:
>
>> Besides, boost.date_time I think these other libs are good candidates 
>> (maybe
>> with slight modifications):
>>
>> 2. optional
>>
> This would be very useful addition.
>
> It would likely require update of algorithms, e.g. std::sort
> to deal with containers of optionals.

I disagree.  That's what custom comparison operators are for.

-- 
Dave Abrahams
Boost Consulting
www.boost-consulting.com