[boost] Re: compressed_pair requirements?

From: David Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-06-06 13:39:01

"Eric Niebler" <eric_at_[hidden]> writes:

> David Abrahams wrote:
>> You have to take some steps to eliminate the formation of
>> pointers-to-references, i.e. a partial specialization on compilers
>> that support it and some wretched mess everywhere else.
>> 
>
> Fortunately, the existing is_member_function_pointer implementation 
> already provides the wretched mess. I was merely suggesting a small 
> tweak to the existing implementation to avoid the 
> non-POD-through-the-dots badness.

I figured, but it doesn't hurt to be sure.
-- 
Dave Abrahams
Boost Consulting
www.boost-consulting.com