Re: [boost] Re: [function types] Update

From: John Maddock (john_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-06-11 04:44:19

> Well, all changes may (in certain circumstances) keep a reviewer from 
> "fully evaluating the library". Some clarification of the guidelines would 
> not be amiss.

Apologies for being behind the curve with this, but ideally you would have 
left the original review version unchanged, and posted an "_updated" version 
that folks could look at if they wanted.  However, now it's done probably 
best to leave it as it is, otherwise we'll get even more churn.

John.