Re: [boost] [function types] New tag type logic [update]

From: Rob Stewart (stewart_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-06-30 15:59:06

From: Tobias Schwinger <tschwinger_at_[hidden]>
> > Rob Stewart wrote:
> >>>
> >>>   When classifying types it is often necessary to match against several
> >>>   variations of one aspect. There are special variations which make this
> >>>   possible. These are called *abstract variations*.
> >>
> But the term "variation" is used too often in this sentence.
> 
>      When classifying types it is often necessary to match against several
>      variations of one aspect. There are special, *abstract* variations for that.

I'll grant that it is repetitious, but I don't care for your
change.  Here's another try:

   When classifying types it is often necessary to match against
   several variations of one aspect.  Special, *abstract*
   variations make this possible.

-- 
Rob Stewart                           stewart_at_[hidden]
Software Engineer                     http://www.sig.com
Susquehanna International Group, LLP  using std::disclaimer;