From: Robert Ramey (ramey_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-07-05 16:19:06
Sorry, I haven't been able to study it with the attention it deserves. How
would it be an improvement over the current implementation in CVS which is
has been proven to pass all versions except borland?
Frank Birbacher wrote:
> Well now, any comments?
> Shall I merge the existing variant.hpp and mine and then post again?
> I'm mostly concerned about saving "which", which is a stack variable.
> the address of this variable tracked while serializing? When saving
> multiple variants is there a chance that any occurrence of "which" is
> not saved, because the variable has the same address than some
> instance before already had?
> Unsubscribe & other changes:
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, david.abrahams at rcn.com, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk