From: David Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-07-09 08:16:03
Rob Stewart <stewart_at_[hidden]> writes:
> Something got munged here. Here's another try:
> The following expression produces a function type for variadic
> functions with a first parameter of type int which return an
> int. Since a calling convention isn't specified, the default
> calling convention is used.
The following expression produces a function type for variadic
functions that return an int and have a first parameter of type
>> function_type<mpl::vector<int,int>, variadic>::type
> As before, I suggest changing the return or parameter type.
That's a good idea.
-- Dave Abrahams Boost Consulting www.boost-consulting.com
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, david.abrahams at rcn.com, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk