Re: [boost] [parameter] ArgumentPack + macros

From: Cromwell Enage (sponage_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-07-14 10:45:21

--- David Abrahams wrote:
> I don't understand the question.  Could you say,
> 
>   shouldn't it be
> 
>         XXXXXXXXXXXX
> 
>   instead of
> 
>         YYYYYYYYYYYY
> 
> ??

Currently, code using the macros looks like the
following:

BOOST_PARAMETER_FUN(...)
{
    typedef typename
              boost::parameter::binding<
                  Params    // template parameter name
                , tag::foo_
              >::type
            bar_;
}

For the sake of consistency, I was asking for the
macros to be changed so that user code would look like
the following:

BOOST_PARAMETER_FUN(...)
{
    typedef typename
              boost::parameter::binding<
                  ArgumentPack  // matches concept
                , tag::foo_
              >::type
            bar_;
}

                              Cromwell D. Enage

                
____________________________________________________
Start your day with Yahoo! - make it your home page 
http://www.yahoo.com/r/hs