From: Paul Mensonides (pmenso57_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-08-09 04:16:28
> -----Original Message-----
> From: boost-bounces_at_[hidden]
> [mailto:boost-bounces_at_[hidden]] On Behalf Of Rene Rivera
> > I'm convinced the usability issue
> > is big enough to justify the change.
> Usability is *very* subjective aspect. Your version is for
> you more usable. But for others, like the visually impaired
> it's likely not more usable, as Daniel pointed out. Thanks
> Daniel for that link, I've looked for a long time for a way
> to test color blindness usability.
BTW, I'm color blind such that nearly all images that I test on the Deuteranope
simulation at Vischeck look identical to the original image. For what its
worth, just about any of the web page attempts so far look fine, and I think
people might be making the color issue more of a usability issue than it
actually is. I don't know if it is even possible to come up with a color scheme
that looks good to both people with normal vision and people with severe
blue-yellow deficiencies at the same time unless the color scheme is grayscale.
>From my point of view, differences in brightness are the most distinguishing
elements, and I tend to prefer grayscale color schemes because there is less
distraction caused by hue. But that's only a preference; it is rarely difficult
(to a significant degree) to navigate web pages or find links. Obviously, there
are people with a much greater degree of color blindness than me, but the
majority (by far) of color blind people don't have significant trouble with
stuff like this.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, david.abrahams at rcn.com, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk