Re: [boost] boost dll versions

From: Stefan Seefeld (seefeld_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-08-15 09:53:07

Rob Stewart wrote:

> I suggested using "simple numbers" only as major version
> numbers.  Boost does release patches to release builds, hence the
> current discussion as to whether there would be a 1.33.1.  I
> contend that version should be 33.1.1.

Fine. But as long as it carries the same 'major version number' (33)
it should be ABI-compatible with that release or else that number
looses its meaning.

Regards,
                Stefan