From: Luke Elliott (luke_elliott_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-08-23 08:13:26
Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> Nigel Stewart wrote:
>>>Both warnings a pretty harmless hence the usual recommendation to
>>>disable the warning, I guess.
>>>However, the warnings can be removed by exporting only members which
>>>truly need to be exported - I was just curious as to why it isn't done
>>>in boost (possibly GCC issues?).
>> I would be a bit reluctant about "pollution"
>> of the boost header files, for the sake of
>> a non-standard compiler feature/bug.
> Have you seen the boost header files?! :)
> Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
There are some other benefits: smaller binaries, the optimizer seems to
do a better job...
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, david.abrahams at rcn.com, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk