Re: [boost] warning C4275 with VC++ (non dll-interface class...) (again)

From: Luke Elliott (luke_elliott_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-08-23 08:13:26

Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> Nigel Stewart wrote:
> 
> 
>>>Both warnings a pretty harmless hence the usual recommendation to 
>>>disable the warning, I guess.
>>>
>>>However, the warnings can be removed by exporting only members which 
>>>truly need to be exported - I was just curious as to why it isn't done 
>>>in boost (possibly GCC issues?).
>>
>>	I would be a bit reluctant about "pollution"
>>	of the boost header files, for the sake of
>>	a non-standard compiler feature/bug.
> 
> 
> Have you seen the boost header files?!  :)
> 
> jon
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
> 

There are some other benefits: smaller binaries, the optimizer seems to 
do a better job...