From: Andy Little (andy_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-09-07 14:21:24
"Joel Eidsath" <jeidsath_at_[hidden]> wrote
> Okay, so this whole thing was just a naming issue?
It started as a misunderstanding on my part because of my preconceptions about
what a rational is, but it is just a naming issue. I believe that renaming would
result in greater clarity which surely cant be a bad thing. Apologies for making
so much noise.
>You have nothing to
> say about how I should code things?
Certainly not! Your ideas so far sound exciting. I will certainly be
interested to follow your progress.
> Sure, no problem. I was following
> Stroup's NTL who names his classes "ZZ" (Z stands for the integers in
> mathematics) and "RR" (R stands for the reals) respectively. All I'm
> working on right now is implementation. Suggest a name, and I'll note it.
How about APF standing for abitrary precision float?
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, david.abrahams at rcn.com, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk