Re: [boost] Boost regression notification (2005-09-22 [RC_1_33_0])

From: Douglas Gregor (doug.gregor_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-09-22 12:49:08

On Sep 22, 2005, at 12:06 PM, Douglas Gregor wrote:

> Boost regression test failures
> ------------------------------
> Detailed report:
>   http://engineering.meta-comm.com/boost-regression/CVS-RC_1_33_0/ 
> developer/issues.html
>
> 127 failures in 9 libraries:
>   concept_check (20)
>   foreach (1)
>   graph (5)
>   random (1)
>   range (3)
>   serialization (70)
>   thread (8)
>   utility/enable_if (16)
>   wave (3)

We really need to start cleaning up these failures...

> |concept_check|
>   stl_concept_covering:  borland-5_6_4  cw-8_3  cw-9_4  cw-9_5- 
> darwin  gcc-2.95.3-linux  gcc-2.95.3-stlport-4.6.2-linux gcc-3.2.3- 
> linux  gcc-3.3.6-linux  gcc-3.4.4-linux  gcc-3_3-darwin  gcc-4.0.1- 
> linux  gcc-4_0-darwin  intel-8.1-linux  intel-9.0-linux  intel- 
> win32-8_1  intel-win32-9_0  vc-6_5  vc-6_5-stlport  vc-7_0  vc-7_1

That's just about every platform we test on :) I don't expect we'll  
get this test ready for 1.33.1, so we should probably ditch it for now.

> |graph|
>   betweenness_centrality_test:  gcc-3.4.4-linux
>   dag_longest_paths:  gcc-3.4.4-linux
>   dijkstra_cc:  gcc-3.4.4-linux
>   dijkstra_heap_performance:  gcc-3.4.4-linux
>   relaxed_heap_test:  gcc-3.4.4-linux

These should clean up when the tests cycle.

> |thread|
>   test_barrier_lib:  intel-9.0-linux
>   test_condition_lib:  intel-9.0-linux
>   test_mutex_lib:  intel-9.0-linux
>   test_once_lib:  intel-9.0-linux
>   test_read_write_mutex_lib:  intel-9.0-linux
>   test_thread_lib:  intel-9.0-linux
>   test_tss_lib:  intel-9.0-linux
>   test_xtime_lib:  intel-9.0-linux
>
>
> |wave|
>   test_re2c_lexer:  intel-9.0-linux
>   test_slex_lexer:  intel-9.0-linux
>   testwave:  intel-9.0-linux

We're hoping that the removal of <runtime-link>static fixes these  
issues...

> |utility/enable_if|
>   constructors:  gcc-2.95.3-linux  gcc-2.95.3-stlport-4.6.2-linux
>   dummy_arg_disambiguation:  gcc-2.95.3-linux  gcc-2.95.3- 
> stlport-4.6.2-linux
>   lazy:  gcc-2.95.3-linux  gcc-2.95.3-stlport-4.6.2-linux
>   lazy_test:  gcc-2.95.3-linux  gcc-2.95.3-stlport-4.6.2-linux
>   member_templates:  gcc-2.95.3-linux  gcc-2.95.3-stlport-4.6.2-linux
>   namespace_disambiguation:  gcc-2.95.3-linux  gcc-2.95.3- 
> stlport-4.6.2-linux
>   no_disambiguation:  gcc-2.95.3-linux  gcc-2.95.3-stlport-4.6.2-linux
>   partial_specializations:  gcc-2.95.3-linux  gcc-2.95.3- 
> stlport-4.6.2-linux

enable_if is unusable on GCC 2.95.3; I've marked it as such.

     Doug