Boost :

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

From: David Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-10-14 14:38:32

Next message: Ian McCulloch: "Re: [boost] [Serialization] why operator &()?"
Previous message: David Abrahams: "Re: [boost] [Serialization] why operator &()?"
In reply to: Joel de Guzman: "Re: [boost] Report from Mont Tremblant C++ Committee meeting"
Next in thread: Joel de Guzman: "Re: [boost] Report from Mont Tremblant C++ Committee meeting"
Reply: Joel de Guzman: "Re: [boost] Report from Mont Tremblant C++ Committee meeting"

Joel de Guzman <joel_at_[hidden]> writes:

>> Rebinding semantics are there _precisely_ and _only_ to solve a problem
>> posed by nullability.
>
> Sorry, I don't buy that.

Why not?

-- 
Dave Abrahams
Boost Consulting
www.boost-consulting.com

Next message: Ian McCulloch: "Re: [boost] [Serialization] why operator &()?"
Previous message: David Abrahams: "Re: [boost] [Serialization] why operator &()?"
In reply to: Joel de Guzman: "Re: [boost] Report from Mont Tremblant C++ Committee meeting"
Next in thread: Joel de Guzman: "Re: [boost] Report from Mont Tremblant C++ Committee meeting"
Reply: Joel de Guzman: "Re: [boost] Report from Mont Tremblant C++ Committee meeting"

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk