From: Robert Ramey (ramey_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-10-19 00:55:04
David Abrahams wrote:
> "Robert Ramey" <ramey_at_[hidden]> writes:
>>> Why should anyone still use the other version? To save the compile
>>> time for 5 lines of code?
>> LOL - believe me, someone will want to do it differently. I can't
>> say how or why - but believe me it will happen. The adaptor
>> approach lets everyone add their own thing and lets everyone else
>> pick and choose which combination of things they want to add.
> IIUC, you currently have some default implmentation that's 10x slower
> than the one Matthias is proposing. Is there any good reason that the
> fast implementation shouldn't be the default?
The current implemenation is universal. The fast ... archive will only make
a difference on those collections whose storage is contiguous. Its not even
to me that std::vector is storage is guarenteed to be contiguouse. Its not
its even applicable to archives other than native binary
Basically Mattias enhancement is an exploitation of a special cases. That's
a very good idea. But that's not the same replace of the general solution
more intricate and more fragil - at no improvment in performance.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, david.abrahams at rcn.com, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk