Re: [boost] Active objects?

From: Matt Calabrese (rivorus_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-11-02 14:28:54

On 11/1/05, Jason Hise <chaos_at_[hidden]> wrote:

> template < typename ReturnType [, ...] >
> future < ReturnType > enqueue( ReturnType (Type::*func) ( [...] ) [,
> ...] );

I'd personally prefer using the member function pointer as an explicit
template argument, allowing for the calling syntax:

enqueue< &your_type::member_function >( your, arguments, go, here );

Again, with proper forms having different amounts of parameters generated by
Boost.Preprocessor.

--
-Matt Calabrese