From: Jerry Schwarz (jerry_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-11-18 16:08:43
>I don't think XML/text archives should attempt to guarantee that
>floating point types that are denormalized or inf or nan, in any form,
>are to-the-bit identical after a trip through one of the the
>serialization library's text archives (and it should guarantee only
>that zero is still zero). It's a text archive, you get a text
>representation, and there is no standard for text representations of
>wacky floating-point types. Fullstop.
>One reason you would want to write an XML archive is to be able to
>play with it with tools independent of boost::serialization. This
>means you will need to be able to understand the text representations,
>and since no standard exists, the representation may not be too
>complicated, as that would be a hassle maintenance wise.
Actually, there is a standard for floats in XML. See
http://www.w3.org/TR/xmlschema-2/#float. Of course this doesn't mean
that any particular C++ implementation is able to support these values,
but it does suggest the way to represent them in XML files when the
implementation does support them.
Incidentally I recommend the Clinger paper referenced there to anyone
interested in external representation of floating point types. I also
recommend The Steele et. al. paper referenced at the end of the Clinger
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, david.abrahams at rcn.com, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk