From: Martin Bonner (martin.bonner_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-12-12 11:34:49
From: Giovanni P. Deretta [mailto:gpderetta_at_[hidden]]
Sent: 12 December 2005 16:00
Subject: Re: [boost] [asio] my review
>> I'm against introduzing exceptions. But I agree it may be possible to
>> work a little more in the error handling. But, IMO, it should be like
>> adding helper classes for this, but not throwing exceptions.
> I think too that the current asio error handling interface is fine,
> and it is not worth changing it a this time.
Has anybody got a "non-ignorable return" class that they could add to boost?
(A class that encapsulates a return value whose destructor asserts/aborts if
the return code has not been examined or deliberatedly ignored by the
It would be a natural for this sort of application, and would be a generally
useful utility class.
-- Martin Bonner Martin.Bonner_at_[hidden] Pi Technology, Milton Hall, Ely Road, Milton, Cambridge, CB4 6WZ, ENGLAND Tel: +44 (0)1223 441434
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, david.abrahams at rcn.com, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk