Re: [boost] interest on a geometry library

From: Richard Newman (richard_at_[hidden])
Date: 2006-03-17 12:17:53

Is it reasonable to extend the logic to check for 3D shapes (i.e., 
spheres instead of circles, etc.)?

It certainly would be a reasonable strategy to get the 2D work you have 
into the library and treat 3D as a later extension.

Kind regards,
Richard Newman

rodolfo_at_[hidden] wrote:
> Hi, is there any interest on a geomery library? It has primitives like
> point, rectangle, circle, triangle, polygon, and functions that operates
> on them like intersect, union, test if a point is inside, etc. I have
> some classes that I've built to use in my projects and would like to get
> it into boost, for everyone's profit.
> 
> Sorry if there's already another library trying to get into boost with
> these characteristics. At least I didn't find it in the sandbox.
> 
> Regards,
> Rodolfo Lima
> 
> 		
> _______________________________________________________
> Yahoo! Acesso Grátis - Internet rápida e grátis. Instale o discador agora!
> http://br.acesso.yahoo.com
> 
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost