Re: [boost] [type_traits] Re: New implementation of remove_xxx for vintage compilers

From: Peder Holt (peder.holt_at_[hidden])
Date: 2006-03-26 03:32:36

On 3/24/06, Thomas Witt <witt_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> Peder Holt wrote:
> > On 2/11/06, David Abrahams <dave_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> >> Eric Niebler <eric_at_[hidden]> writes:
> >>
> >>> Peder Holt wrote:
> >>>> On 11/28/05, Douglas Gregor <doug.gregor_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> >>>>> On Nov 27, 2005, at 5:39 AM, John Maddock wrote:
> >>>>>> We should only be a few days away from a 1.33.1 release now
> >>>>>> anyway....?
> >>>>> Prerelease tarballs of 1.33.1 should be available by midweek, and the
> >>>>> full release will be on December 5.
> >>>>>
> >>>>>         Doug
> >>>> What is the status on this now? It would be nice if this made it in
> >>>> the 1.34 release...
> >>> I tested it an was all set for a check-in, but now we have nobody
> >>> running tests on vc6/7.0. I can't check it in without regression tests,
> >>> and now we're in feature freeze, so I guess this one doesn't make the cut.
> >> I'm prepared to start running vc6/vc7 tests, if that's what it takes.
> >
> > Sorry for nagging about this, but I see that the regression tests for
> > VC6.5 and VC7.0 are up. I know we're in feature freeze, but from what
> > I understand much of the point of setting up the VC6.5 and VC7.0
> > regression tests again was to have a version of BOOST with the
> > remove_xxx hack in it. What should we do about it?
>
> I am ok with putting this in, despite feature freeze.
>

Thanks. I'll commit them to HEAD first, and if no new regressions pop
up (and nobody protests) I'll merge them to the release branch during
the coming week.

Regards,
Peder

> Thomas
>
> Release Manager
>
>
>
> --
> Thomas Witt
> witt_at_[hidden]
>
> _______________________________________________
> Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
>